IT Business Lab Class 8 - Panel Data Analysis
1 Pooled affect model
2 Fixed affect model
3 Random affect model
To determine most efficient model by using following functions:
pFtest : Fixed vs Pooled
plmtest : Pooled vs Random
phtest: Random vs Fixed
Pooled Model
pool<-plm( log(pcap) ~ log(hwy) + log(water) + log(util) + log(pc) + log(gsp) + log(emp) + log(unemp)
, data= Produc, model = ("pooling"), index = c("state","year"))
Fixed Model
fixed<-plm( log(pcap) ~ log(hwy) + log(water) + log(util) + log(pc) + log(gsp) + log(emp) + log(unemp)
, data= Produc, model = ("within"), index = c("state","year"))
Random Model
random<-plm( log(pcap) ~ log(hwy) + log(water) + log(util) + log(pc) + log(gsp) + log(emp) + log(unemp)
, data= Produc, model = ("random"), index = c("state","year"))
Pooled vs Fixed
Null Hypothesis: Pooled Model is efficient than fixed model
Alternate Hypothesis : Pooled model is not efficient than the fixed model
Since the p value is very small, we reject the Null Hypothesis. And so alternate hypothesis is accepted which is to accept Fixed Model is better than Pooled Model
Pooled vs Random
Null Hypothesis: Pooled Model is efficient than Random model
Alternate Hypothesis: Random Model is efficient than Pooled model
Since the p value is very small, we reject the Null Hypothesis. And so alternate hypothesis is accepted which is to accept Random Model is better than Pooled Model
Random vs Fixed
Null Hypothesis: No Correlation . Random Model
Alternate Hypothesis: Fixed Model
Since the p value is negligible so we reject the Null Hypothesis and hence Alternate hypothesis is accepted which is to accept Fixed Model.
Conclusion:
The analysis proves that
Fixed Model is the best suited to do the panel data analysis for "Produc"
data set. And also we observe that within the same id the variation is null.






No comments:
Post a Comment